Communicative Language Teaching: A Pathway to Real-World English Skills


Language learning is an adventure, and to make sure progress is being measured accurately, it's essential to have markers along the way to gauge progress. Traditional testing methods, while useful, have their limitations; often focusing on isolated grammar and vocabulary knowledge rather than how it's being applied in context. Communicative language tests offer another alternative, particularly for teaching English language learners, where contextual application and real-world communication skills are critical.

Communicative Language Teaching: A Pathway to Real-World English Skills-TeacherRecord

WHAT IS A COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEST?

Communicative language tests provide more than just an exam; they're an experience! Students immerse themselves in realistic scenarios using language that mirrors everyday situations. This means the goal isn't perfect grammar or an impressive vocabulary but instead communication—understanding and being understood.

A communicative language test evaluates both receptive and productive language abilities of its participants. Receptive skills involve listening and reading, while productive abilities involve speaking and writing. The test assesses students on their ability to use these abilities when performing specific tasks such as making restaurant reservations or giving directions. For teaching English language learners, these tasks simulate real-life interactions, helping bridge the gap between classroom learning and practical application.

HOW CAN COMMUNICATIVE TESTS DIFFER FROM TRADITIONAL LANGUAGE TESTS?

Traditional language tests tend to be limited in scope, focusing mainly on memorizing grammar rules and vocabulary lists for assessment. Though these skills are critical in learning the language, they don't accurately represent students' ability to communicate effectively during real-life scenarios. For teaching English language learners, this gap can be particularly significant, as real-world communication often requires flexibility, cultural awareness, and adaptability.

Communicative tests aim to assess students' overall communicative competence. They evaluate how effectively students use language within its context—taking into account appropriateness, fluency, and coherence among other criteria—which ultimately helps them communicate more effectively and complete tasks successfully. For teaching English language learners, this focus on practical skills fosters confidence and prepares them for authentic interactions.

EXAMPLE OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TESTS (CLTs)

Communicative language tests offer many possibilities to assess student language level and needs. Here are a few examples:

  1. Deciding On A Movie To Watch: Students could be provided with a list of movies with short descriptions. Their task could be to discuss with their partner and select one to watch while providing reasons why.

  2. Ordering Food at a Restaurant: Students could roleplay a scenario where they're at a restaurant and need to order food, from reading menus and asking about ingredients to placing special requests.

  3. Giving Suggestions to a Friend: In an exercise in giving advice, students could be put in situations in which one of their friends needs advice on an issue they face, prompting them to offer suggestions and defend them as best they can.

For teaching English language learners, these tasks provide low-stakes opportunities to practice language in a supportive environment, reinforcing learning through action.

WHAT ARE THE RESTRICTIONS OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TESTS?

Though communicative language tests offer numerous advantages, they do come with some risks. Assessing them can be more challenging than traditional exams since there may be no clear right or wrong answers available; and performance evaluation can often be subjective.

Establishing relevant, realistic tests can be a time-consuming endeavor for educators. They must carefully consider their students' language levels, interests, and cultural background when creating such tests. For teaching English language learners, this requires an understanding of diverse cultural norms and linguistic abilities, which can add complexity to test design.

Time constraints may also come into play; unlike written tests where students take them simultaneously, communicative tasks often require individual or small-group assessments that require time-intensive teacher assessment processes.

WHY SHOULD TEACHERS CONSIDER EMPLOYING COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TESTS?

Although communicative language tests present unique challenges, their benefits are numerous. They offer more accurate assessments of students' language abilities while adapting easily to any age or level—making them flexible and pertinent. For teaching English language learners, this adaptability ensures that tests are tailored to individual needs, fostering growth and confidence.

Communicative tests can also be more engaging and motivating for students. By showing them the practical application of what they are studying, such tests help increase confidence among learners while encouraging further growth in language acquisition. For teaching English language learners, this engagement is key to maintaining motivation and overcoming the challenges of learning a new language.

These tests offer invaluable feedback to both teachers and students. They can reveal areas of strength or weakness that might not appear on traditional tests, providing direction for future teaching and learning activities. For teaching English language learners, this feedback is crucial for addressing gaps and building on existing skills.

Traditional tests provide one approach to language learning; communicative language tests offer an additional perspective. By encouraging students to use language meaningfully in tests that reflect real-world communication complexity and richness, communicative tests equip English language learners with the tools they need to thrive. While communicative tests do pose some unique challenges for language teachers, their benefits often outweigh any drawbacks—make an effort and give these exams a go; your students might surprise you with their communicative abilities!

View More